Most good poker players know that stack size selection is a very important part of the game, whether you’re playing in a live casino or online at Titan Poker (more) or Bet365 Poker (more). In many games even the pros won’t have much of an edge against several players on the table. Almost all of your equity will come from a few select players at a table, and having enough chips to cover them, while not get “into trouble” against the good players tends to be an optimal strategy.
When you are seated at a tournament however you all start with the same number of chips, then the game will determine stack sizes from there. It is easy to find yourself playing a stack size that is not beneficial to your particular table. Most players write this off as a part of the luck involved with poker, some even avoid tournaments because of this “locked in luck” that is in addition to the luck you face beyond catching cards and having them hold up. This article will attempt to show options on to wield a stack with its full force.
What is an optimal stack in MTT? Well there are a few different ranges that play particularly well. They limit the number of mistakes you will make while often maximizing the number of mistakes your opponents will make against you. If you are in a tournament that is not likely to break your table for a long time then you should access “deep stackedness” in relative terms to your table instead of the field.
Usually variance increasing isn’t about getting a 3x average stack or more. It tends to be about avoiding stack sizes that play particularly bad. Fortunately there is a doubling phenomenon that occurs with stack sizes in relation to the number of bets that tend to play the best against certain types of players. Your strategy is to put the last bet in with fold equity when you are weak, and let them put the last bet in with what appears to be fold equity when you are very strong. Frequently this will involve moderately short stacked play, and thus controlling your stack is key to maximizing equity.
For instance if the blinds are 1000-2000 with a 250 antee 8 handed it costs 5000 chips per round
If you had a stack between 10k and 30k you really wouldn’t want to open a pot for less than a shove, still doing so has the potential to win the pot without a showdown. I call this a 1 bet stack when opening a pot, but the upper range of this would have the potential to re-raise a small opening raise and still win the pot without showdown making it fall into the next category under some circumstances.
A two bet stack will depend on what size opening bets your opponents are making. It is called a 2 bet stack because you still have fold equity when someone with more chips enters the pot with a raise. In the example above a 2 bet stack will tend to fall into the ranges between 25k and 60k chips. But these estimates will not only change from table to table, but it will also change depending on the opponent you are up against.
A 3 bet stack will have fold equity when you open raise, they re-raise, and then you push. By varying bet size you can adjust weather or not you have a 3 bet stack, or a deep stack. With smaller stack sizes you don’t have this option, but in the upper levels of 3 bet play, you will usually be making the first raise, their raise will usually be proportional. If you open pots with a small ball raise another round of betting will likely occur, and it will make it that much more difficult for you to be correct to shove (and correspondingly for them to be correct to call a re-shove 3 bet all-in by you).
A 4 bet stack or more is really just deep stacked poker. By the time you get to 4 or more bets position gains substantial value.
1 Bet stacks always play well. If the table is aggressive enough you are likely to double easily, if they are tight then stealing is hugely profitable.
2 Bet stacks are very difficult. Many players, even profitable end up in this stack range and feel helpless. Since opening and folding to a raise tends to be wrong you have to turn the tables to find profitable plays. Many players who open light will have the ability to fold to a re-raise all-in. Mixing this with a Big blind that has the ability to fold to your re-shove, and you have a great spot to re-steal from late position with a very wide range of hands. I recommend in marginal versions of this scenario choose a hand that doesn’t contain an ace, 2, 3, 4, 5 or 6. The problem with these hands is that so frequently you get called by hands that either dominate a weak ace, or by pairs that effectively dominate cards below a 6. I also don’t like making these re-steals with baby pairs: 22, 33,and 44. Medium to large kings tend to be particularly good hands for this play because when you get called you are less likely to be in the above situation that with just about any other hand. 2 Bet stacks also include “Stop-And-Go” options where you call a raise from the Big blind, then push most flops. I prefer playing stop and go strategies to re-steals when there are more flops i would consider slow playing on to trap my opponent for a double up. This play tends to only apply to out of position calls with a stack in this range.
Three bet and larger stacks are powerful because they are so flexible. A 3-Bet stack plays well on its own, and can be used with increased variance without risk of going bust. A 3-bet stack’s biggest enemy is a 2 bet stack that knows when to re-steal. If you have one of these on your left i suggest having some what tight standards for opening a pot. 3-bet stacks also include options such as taking flops in position and re-stealing without shoving.
When there is already a deep stack on the table:
Going for a deep stack with another deep stack on the table is not a beginner play. The situations you will end up in with a deep stack vs. deep stack will likely be the toughest tournament decisions you will have to make. If you are good at these decisions (or at least better than your other deep opponents) then having this stack is a huge advantage. However, if you are a player that tends to avoid another deep stack player because you are afraid of giving up that many chips in a marginal situation then you should decrease your variance from a medium stack while there are deep stacks on your table.
You should also avoid increasing variance to get a deep stack if the other deep stacks are sitting on your left, or are more skilled than you are. Even if the bad player doesn’t understand position, it tends to not be worth increasing your variance to play deep against an opponent who you will be out of position against on 80% or more of hands.